Compare
Where Versyka fits.
Most teams already use Dependabot or Renovate, and some use codemods, security scanners or coding agents. Here's what each does when an upgrade needs more than a version bump.
| Capability | Versyka | Dependabot / Renovate | Codemods | AI coding agents | By hand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notices a new major version | Yes | Yes | — | — | — |
| Rewrites code for breaking changes | Yes | — | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works without a per-change script | Yes | Yes | — | Yes | Yes |
| Finds call sites deterministically | Yes | — | Yes | Partly | Partly |
| Runs your tests and fixes failures before the PR | Yes | Partly | — | Partly | Yes |
| Opens a reviewable pull request | Yes | Yes | — | Partly | Yes |
| Same migration across many repos | Yes | Yes | Partly | — | — |
| Version bumps for vulnerable packages | Yes | Yes | — | Partly | Yes |
| Breaking upgrades fixed in the code | Yes | — | — | Partly | Yes |
| Blocks only on new test failures (compares before and after) | Yes | — | — | — | Partly |
| Finds and replaces retiring AI models | Yes | — | — | Partly | Partly |
| Shows the cost and changes before it starts | Yes | — | — | — | Yes |
| Engineer time per upgrade | Review only | Fix failing PR | Write the codemod | Prompt + verify | Days |
What only Versyka does
When an upgrade breaks your code, Versyka rewrites the affected calls and runs your checks. Other tools stop at the version bump and leave the rest to an engineer.
Your tests run before and after every upgrade. Failures that were already there don't hold up a fix; new ones do, with the reason shown.
Each package upgrade shows the published advisories behind it. You tick what to fix and see exactly what will change, and what it costs, before anything runs.
Version bumps and the rewrites, in one place.
Package upgrades, outdated SDKs and retiring AI models, each as a tested pull request you review. Try it on one upgrade you've been putting off.